The GIS and AHP-Based Identification and Improvement of Groundwater Recharge Zones in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65486/n3yyy549

Keywords:

Groundwater recharge, Geographic Information System (GIS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), Kandahar Province

Abstract

Purpose

Groundwater is the principal source of water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial uses in Kandahar Province. Increasing groundwater abstraction, rapid urbanization, prolonged drought, and limited natural recharge have significantly stressed available groundwater resources. This study aimed to identify and map groundwater recharge potential zones using an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to support sustainable groundwater management.

Methodology

Eight hydrogeological and environmental factors, including rainfall, slope, drainage density, soil texture, geology, land use/land cover (LULC), lineament density, and aspect, were selected based on their influence on groundwater recharge. Spatial datasets obtained from satellite imagery and secondary sources were processed in a GIS environment to generate thematic layers. The relative importance of each factor was determined using the AHP pairwise comparison method, and the resulting weights were integrated through weighted overlay analysis to produce a groundwater recharge potential map. The consistency of the AHP matrix was evaluated using the Consistency Ratio (CR).

Results

The integrated GIS–AHP framework successfully delineated groundwater recharge potential zones across Kandahar Province. The resulting recharge potential map classified the study area into four categories (low, moderate, high, and very high). Areas characterized by gentle slopes, permeable soils, Quaternary formations, low drainage density, and favorable land-use conditions exhibited the highest recharge potential. The very high and high recharge classes covered 18.2% and 26.7% of the province, respectively, and were concentrated mainly in the northern and central parts of Kandahar, whereas mountainous, desert, and urbanized areas generally exhibited lower recharge suitability. The acceptable consistency ratio (0.038) confirmed the reliability of the weighting process.

Practical Implications

The generated groundwater recharge potential map provides a scientific basis for groundwater exploration, artificial recharge planning, land-use management, and water resource conservation in Kandahar Province. The methodology can also be applied in other arid and semi-arid regions with similar hydrogeological conditions.

Originality

This study provides a province-scale GIS-based MCDA assessment of groundwater recharge potential in Kandahar Province by integrating multiple hydrogeological and environmental datasets within an Analytical Hierarchy Process framework. The developed approach provides a reproducible spatial decision-support tool for sustainable groundwater resource management in data-scarce environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abijith, D., Saravanan, S., Singh, L., Jennifer, J. J., Saranya, T., & Parthasarathy, K. S. S. (2020). GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for identification of potential groundwater recharge zones—A case study from Ponnaniyaru watershed, Tamil Nadu, India. HydroResearch, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2020.02.002

Ali, A., & Bilal, M. (2025). A comprehensive review of GIS and remote sensing applications in assessing land use and land cover impacts on groundwater systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(31), 18631–18652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36787-5

Arulbalaji, P., Padmalal, D., & Sreelash, K. (2019). GIS and AHP techniques based delineation of groundwater potential zones: A case study from Southern Western Ghats, India. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 2082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38567-x

Bennett, G. (2025). A review of the data used to validate groundwater recharge maps created with GIS techniques over the past two decades. HydroResearch, 8, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.12.003

Chowdary, V. M., Jha, M. K., Chowdhury, A., & Mal, B. C. (2009). Integrated remote sensing and GIS-based approach for assessing groundwater potential in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(1), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802270131

Doebrich, J. L., & Wahl, R. R. (2006). Geologic and mineral resource map of Afghanistan (Version 2.0; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1038). U.S. Geological Survey.

Drusch, M., Del Bello, U., Carlier, S., Colin, O., Fernandez, V., Gascon, F., Hoersch, B., Isola, C., Laberinti, P., Martimort, P., Meygret, A., Spoto, F., Sy, O., Marchese, F., & Bargellini, P. (2012). Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026

Eastman, J. R. (2016). TerrSet geospatial monitoring and modeling system manual. Clark Labs, Clark University.

Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Prentice-Hall.

Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., & Michaelsen, J. (2015). The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—A new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data, 2, Article 150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66

Healy, R. W. (2010). Estimating groundwater recharge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780745

Hussaini, M. S., Farahmand, A., Shrestha, S., Neupane, S., & Abrunhosa, M. (2022). Site selection for managed aquifer recharge in the city of Kabul, Afghanistan, using a multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system. Hydrogeology Journal, 30, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02408-x

Karim, A. Q., & Sadat, S. H. (2020). Groundwater of Afghanistan (potential capacity, scarcity, security issues, and solutions). In A. M. Mukherjee (Ed.), Global groundwater: Source, scarcity, sustainability, security, and solutions (pp. 323–328). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818172-0.00045-1

Magesh, N. S., Chandrasekar, N., & Soundranayagam, J. P. (2012). Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geoscience Frontiers, 3(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.007

Maghribi, A. A., Dimyati, M., & Supriatna. (2022). Geographic information system and multi-criteria decision analysis for the determination of groundwater recharge potential: Systematic review. Water Supply, 22(9), 7027–7039. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.297

Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Melese, T., & Belay, T. (2022). Groundwater potential zone mapping using analytical hierarchy process and GIS in Muga Watershed, Abay Basin, Ethiopia. Global Challenges, 6(1), 2100068. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100068

Meng, F., Khan, M. I., Naqvi, S. A. A., Sarwar, A., Islam, F., Ali, M., Tariq, A., Ullah, S., Soufan, W., & Faraj, T. K. (2024). Identification and mapping of groundwater recharge zones using multi influencing factor and analytical hierarchy process. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 19240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70324-7

Monir, M. M., Sarker, S. C., & Islam, A. R. M. T. (2024). A critical review on groundwater level depletion monitoring based on GIS and data-driven models: Global perspectives and future challenges. HydroResearch, 7, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.05.001

Noori, A. R., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Status of groundwater resource potential and its quality at Kabul, Afghanistan: A review. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80, Article 654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09954-3

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6

Sallwey, J., Bonilla Valverde, J. P., Vásquez López, F., Junghanns, R., & Stefan, C. (2019). Suitability maps for managed aquifer recharge: A review of multi-criteria decision analysis studies. Environmental Reviews, 27(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0069

Shabani, M., Masoumi, Z., & Rezaei, A. (2022). Assessment of groundwater potential using multi-criteria decision analysis and geoelectrical surveying. Geo-spatial Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2022.2069052

Singh, K., Sharma, A., Sharma, A., et al. (2026). AHP integrated geospatial application for identifying groundwater recharge zones accounting for temporal variations through multi-criterion weighted overlay analysis. Scientific Reports, 16, Article 16431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45064-5

Singh, S. K., & Noori, A. R. (2022). Delineation of groundwater recharge potential zones for its sustainable development utilizing GIS approach in Kabul basin, Afghanistan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15, Article 146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09410-3

Todd, D. K., & Mays, L. W. (2005). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme. (2022). The United Nations world water development report 2022: Groundwater—Making the invisible visible. UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

09/24/2026

How to Cite

The GIS and AHP-Based Identification and Improvement of Groundwater Recharge Zones in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan. (2026). Gandhara Journal of Natural Sciences, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65486/n3yyy549